While food insecurity in South Africa is commonly framed as a rural problem, food insecurity is increasingly concentrated in urban areas.

What’s more, food system activities – including production, processing, retail and waste – take place within cities. However, neither food insecurity nor the food system have been given enough recognition or thought in the ways cities are designed.

These are the central arguments of ‘Food Sensitive Planning and Urban Design – A Blueprint for a Future South African City?’, a new working paper published by the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Food Security.

The governance of urban food systems in African [and South African] cities happens in an uncoordinated and unintegrated way

In June this year, in what was the first contested case of excessive pricing related to the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa, the Competition Tribunal found a company called Babelegi Workwear and Industrial Supplies guilty of what it described as “progressively bolder” price hikes on face masks.

As with essential items like face masks, there have also been concerns about the observable rise in food prices over the lockdown.

In Africa, and globally, food crops are expected to be under much increased threats over the next couple of decades as climate change intensifies, demanding that scientists explore creative new ways to protect these crops.

Differences in the root architecture of plants appear to influence how some plants cope well with droughts

National and global food systems are not working for the billions around the world who suffer from hunger and malnutrition. This will have devastating consequences for those afflicted.

This was the resounding message coming out of a social dialogue on World Food Day titled ‘Food is Our Right: The Struggle for Equitable Food Systems’. The event was co-hosted by the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Food Security (CoE-FS), the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) at the University of the Western Cape (UWC), and C19 People’s Coalition Food Working Group.

The maxim that the only constant in life is change, an expression whose origins is credited to Ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus, neatly sums up the evolution of food systems.

The #FoodTalks webinar, the first of a series of virtual dialogues launched this week by the DSI/NRF* Centre of Excellence in Food Security (CoE-FS) ahead of World Food Day on Friday, 16 October.

 

On World Food Day (16 October), academics and activists will debate and share insights on the impact of the food system on ensuring the right to food and ending hunger.

It is estimated that in South Africa around 10 million of the 31 million tons of food produced in the country go to waste every year. This total waste is generated at various points along the food system, including on farms, in the retail sector, and even in homes.

Food loss occurs at various points along the food production and distribution chain, with consumers accounting for only 5% of that waste

People are hungry, it’s time for the South African government to remove the bureaucratic red tape limiting access to food. The Southern Africa Food Lab notes with concern indications in the media and from first hand reports, that government is acting to limit civil society initiatives for food security and food relief.

It’s time to remove all red tape in order to feed the hungry

published date:
20206001
author:
Admin

featured:

templateabove quote:
The Southern Africa Food Lab notes with concern indications in the media and from first hand reports that government is acting to limit civil society initiatives for food security and food relief.

It’s time to remove all red tape in order to feed the hungry. Government’s science-based responses to the pandemic, and the vital contributions of civil society initiatives to addressing hunger must be recognised and celebrated.

The lockdown, which was imposed on 27 March 2020, while necessary in slowing the spread of the virus, has had numerous consequences, the most serious of which has been growing hunger. With many industries shut down and people already living on the breadline, there are neither wages nor savings to fall back upon. In addition, the closing of schools has meant that some 9 million children stopped receiving a daily meal through the school feeding scheme. Recent research conducted by Ask Afrika estimates that 1 in 3 adults in South Africa now go to bed hungry. The downturn in economic activities and capacity means that the need will continue to outstrip relief even as we shift to Level 3 restrictions.

One of the great positives to have resulted from this crisis has been the response of civil society organising independently and almost instantaneously to feed people. In addition to existing feeding schemes and soup kitchens ramping up, countless initiatives have started up across the country to feed the nation’s hungriest. Such initiatives have complemented the central role of government.

It is therefore unfortunate that government has responded with counterproductive attempts to exert control over these civil society initiatives. This impulse to control civil society responses ignores the magnitude, complexity, and human costs of the hunger crisis, as well as the inherent constraints that the government faces in responding.

As the Southern Africa Food Lab, we believe that both the science-based response of government to the pandemic and the vital contributions of civil society initiatives to addressing hunger must be recognised and celebrated.

We further believe that the only reasonable way forward if we are to avoid widespread starvation requires that government and other large organisations recognise the complementarity between their efforts and those of emergent networks and initiatives. While such networks must be diligent in abiding by strict standards of health and safety, government officials must commit to helping rather than hindering such work given that the collective goal is the same: that of ensuring the safety of our nation both from COVID-19 and hunger.

What has been demonstrated by the COVID-19 crises is that the nationally controlled and governed food system is flawed. We need far more integrated and local scale responses to food and nutrition security. The pandemic has exposed the inadequacy of existing governance processes and structures to progressively realise the right to food, and the attainment of food and nutrition security. We do not need a Ministry of Food, but for people that are part of local food systems to play a more proactive role in food questions. And for the structures of the state to enable these to work for everyone. This approach, which integrates the experience at a local level, will strengthen policy processes and avoid legal challenges such as the recent judgement allowing soup kitchens and NGOs to continue to operate. Civil society and non-state actors may also need to engage in different ways of working in intersectoral forums, which may well require strategies for ‘stretch’ collaborations if they are to yield valuable new solutions.

These forums are part of the necessary efforts to coordinate deep and wide engagement through a multi-sectoral response with a clear goal in mind. A major reason for vulnerabilities in our provisioning systems is the lack of collaboration and cooperation between different actors within government, the market, and civil society. It’s time to activate the long discussed intersectoral  approach to the food system. Among other things, we need to integrate nutrition more explicitly in our development discourse, including government policies in trade, investment, health, social development and agriculture, amongst others. Non-state actors’ critical role in the current relief response shows again that they must be involved in such co-ordination efforts towards a more just and inclusive food system.

Collaboration rather than control is essential if we are to effectively combat this crisis.

This statement was published by the Southern African Food Lab, a collaborating partner at the Centre of Excellence in Food Security. 
qoute:

quote by:

templatebelowquote:
The Southern Africa Food Lab notes with concern indications in the media and from first hand reports that government is acting to limit civil society initiatives for food security and food relief.

It’s time to remove all red tape in order to feed the hungry. Government’s science-based responses to the pandemic, and the vital contributions of civil society initiatives to addressing hunger must be recognised and celebrated.

The lockdown, which was imposed on 27 March 2020, while necessary in slowing the spread of the virus, has had numerous consequences, the most serious of which has been growing hunger. With many industries shut down and people already living on the breadline, there are neither wages nor savings to fall back upon. In addition, the closing of schools has meant that some 9 million children stopped receiving a daily meal through the school feeding scheme. Recent research conducted by Ask Afrika estimates that 1 in 3 adults in South Africa now go to bed hungry. The downturn in economic activities and capacity means that the need will continue to outstrip relief even as we shift to Level 3 restrictions.

One of the great positives to have resulted from this crisis has been the response of civil society organising independently and almost instantaneously to feed people. In addition to existing feeding schemes and soup kitchens ramping up, countless initiatives have started up across the country to feed the nation’s hungriest. Such initiatives have complemented the central role of government.

It is therefore unfortunate that government has responded with counterproductive attempts to exert control over these civil society initiatives. This impulse to control civil society responses ignores the magnitude, complexity, and human costs of the hunger crisis, as well as the inherent constraints that the government faces in responding.

As the Southern Africa Food Lab, we believe that both the science-based response of government to the pandemic and the vital contributions of civil society initiatives to addressing hunger must be recognised and celebrated.

We further believe that the only reasonable way forward if we are to avoid widespread starvation requires that government and other large organisations recognise the complementarity between their efforts and those of emergent networks and initiatives. While such networks must be diligent in abiding by strict standards of health and safety, government officials must commit to helping rather than hindering such work given that the collective goal is the same: that of ensuring the safety of our nation both from COVID-19 and hunger.

What has been demonstrated by the COVID-19 crises is that the nationally controlled and governed food system is flawed. We need far more integrated and local scale responses to food and nutrition security. The pandemic has exposed the inadequacy of existing governance processes and structures to progressively realise the right to food, and the attainment of food and nutrition security. We do not need a Ministry of Food, but for people that are part of local food systems to play a more proactive role in food questions. And for the structures of the state to enable these to work for everyone. This approach, which integrates the experience at a local level, will strengthen policy processes and avoid legal challenges such as the recent judgement allowing soup kitchens and NGOs to continue to operate. Civil society and non-state actors may also need to engage in different ways of working in intersectoral forums, which may well require strategies for ‘stretch’ collaborations if they are to yield valuable new solutions.

These forums are part of the necessary efforts to coordinate deep and wide engagement through a multi-sectoral response with a clear goal in mind. A major reason for vulnerabilities in our provisioning systems is the lack of collaboration and cooperation between different actors within government, the market, and civil society. It’s time to activate the long discussed intersectoral  approach to the food system. Among other things, we need to integrate nutrition more explicitly in our development discourse, including government policies in trade, investment, health, social development and agriculture, amongst others. Non-state actors’ critical role in the current relief response shows again that they must be involved in such co-ordination efforts towards a more just and inclusive food system.

Collaboration rather than control is essential if we are to effectively combat this crisis.

This statement was published by the Southern African Food Lab, a collaborating partner at the Centre of Excellence in Food Security. 
link:

pic:
http://foodsecurity.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/REd-Tape.Bureaucracy.jpg

Leave a Comment

A long and hard conversation about a basic income grant, or BIG, is looming for South Africa. expanding social grants – and possibly introducing a BIG – may well be within government’s financial reach

Expanding social grants may well be within government’s financial reach

Expanding social grants – and possibly introducing a BIG – may well be within government’s financial reach

Leave a Comment

Social protection experts have called on the South African government to make the COVID-19 emergency relief measures permanent from October, especially the one that allows citizens aged 18 to 59 to access state assistance for the first time ever.

If you don’t have a job, you don’t have social security. The uptake of the COVID-19 grant had proved the depth of the need.

Leave a Comment

« Previous PageNext Page »